Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/gmj/Volume03Issue05-03

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NOT REMOVING REGISTERED FIDUCIARY GUARANTEES FROM THE ONLINE SYSTEM IN BALI

Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna , Universitas Warmadewa
Anak Agung Sagung Shinta Anandita , Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia.

Abstract

Fiduciary guarantees are material guarantees that are most widely used by banks. Fiduciary guarantees have been used by the Indonesian people since the Dutch colonial era. Based on the Circular Letter of the Directorate General of AHU Number AHU-06.OT.03.01 of 2013 concerning the Implementation of the Electronic Fiduciary Registration Administration System, registration of Fiduciary guarantees is no longer carried out at the Fiduciary registration office but is registered on the official website, namely https://Fidusia.ahu .go.id The implementation of the elimination of Fiduciary guarantees registered in the online system is the obligation of the Fiduciary recipients, but in practice there are still Fiduciary recipients who do not fulfill their obligations to notify the removal of Fiduciary guarantees after the Fiduciary giver pays off their debts. There is no sanction that regulates if the Fiduciary recipient does not notify the cancellation of the Fiduciary guarantee which results in this obligation being not adhered to. The method used is the method of writing empirical law. The results that can be concluded in this study are that if the Fiduciary recipient does not notify the deletion of the Fiduciary guarantee, then the Fiduciary guarantee concerned cannot be re-registered.

Keywords

Fiduciary guarantee, deletion, online system

References

Ahmad Sanusi, “Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia dan Akibat Hukumnya”, (Jurnal Ilmiah kebijakan hukum Vol 7 (1), Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI 2013) 63.

Bonaraja Purba et al., “Ekonomi Pembangunan” (Yayasan Kita Menulis 2001) 6.

Frieda Husni Hasibullah, “Hukum Kebendaan Perdata”, (Indhill Co, Jakarta 2005) 7.

Frieda Husni Hasibullah, “Hukum Kebendaan Perdata, Hak-hak yang Memberi Jaminan Jilid 2”, (Indhill Co, Jakarta 2009) 15.

Gunawan Widjaya, et.all, “Jaminan Fidusia”, (PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta 2007) 2.

Lindawati Sewu, “Hukum Bisnis Dalam Perspektif Manusia Modern”, (Refika Aditama, Bandung 2004) 23.

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, “Aneka Hukum Bisnis”, (Alumni Bandung 2005) 78.

Oey Hoey Tiong, “Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Unsur-Unsur Perikatan”, (Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta 1984) 5.

Purwahid Patrik dan kashadi, “Hukum Jaminan”, (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 2008) 32.

Pipin Syarifin, “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum”, (Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2000) 71

Rachmadi Usman, “Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan”, (Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2009) 199.

Soeroso, “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika”, (Jakarta 2006) 295

Tan Kamelo, “Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan”, (Alumni Bandung 2004) 2.

Law

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Code of Civil law.

Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1999 Number 168)

Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 9 of 2013 concerning Implementation of Electronic Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2013 Number 418)

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 25 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Registration, Amendments and Removal of Fiduciary Guarantees. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2021 Number 823)

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NOT REMOVING REGISTERED FIDUCIARY GUARANTEES FROM THE ONLINE SYSTEM IN BALI. (2024). Global Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(05), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.55640/gmj/Volume03Issue05-03