Background: Rapid convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), cyber-physical systems (CPS), and distributed ledger technologies has created both unprecedented capabilities and complex vulnerabilities across domains that include clinical research, Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), agri-food supply chains, and financial services. The disparate literatures on AI-driven protection mechanisms, secure blockchain topologies, and CPS design patterns demand integrated theorization to inform both academic inquiry and practical governance (Syed & Faiza, 2024; Voulgaris et al., 2020).

 Objective: This research article synthesizes theoretical and applied knowledge from the provided references to present a unifying conceptual and methodological framework for AI-enabled resilience in cyber-physical and financial systems. The framework explicates how AI models, secure architectures, and CPS design patterns can act synergistically to mitigate cyber threats, preserve data integrity, and enable trustworthy automation.

 Methods: Using a rigorous integrative review approach grounded in the supplied references, the methodology reconstructs causal pathways between system components (AI agents, sensors, ledgers, network topologies) and adversarial threats. The paper uses systematic cross-domain mapping of threat vectors, defenses, and design principles, supported by close textual analysis of theory and applied studies in the corpus (Lee & Seshia, 2006; Khaitan & Mohan, 2021).

 Results: The synthesis yields a layered resilience architecture: (1) sensing and verification at the edge (IoMT & RFID-enabled traceability), (2) secure transaction and provenance layers (hierarchical blockchain topologies), (3) AI-driven anomaly detection and adaptive response, and (4) governance and auditability mechanisms for human oversight. This architecture addresses confidentiality, integrity, availability, and non-repudiation across domains, and demonstrates how finance-specific requirements for transactional integrity align with CPS safety constraints (Singh, 2025; Rajkumar & Lee, 2010).

 Conclusions: The integrated framework demonstrates that AI is not merely a detection tool but a coordinating agent that—if designed with CPS principles, embedded assurance, and secure ledger topologies—can materially enhance system resilience. Implementation requires domain-specific model assurance, explainability, and regulatory alignment. Future research should empirically validate cross-domain transferability, quantify trade-offs between model complexity and interpretability, and operationalize governance mechanisms for adaptive, AI-mediated security.

Artificial intelligence, cyber-physical systems, IoMT security, blockchain traceability

Syed, Fayazoddin Mulla, and Faiza Kousar ES. "AI in Protecting Clinical Trial Data from Cyber Threats." International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations 1, no. 2 (2024): 567-592.

Bi, Shuochen, and Yufan Lian. "Advanced Portfolio Management in Finance using Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Enhancing Investment Strategies through Machine Learning Models." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4, no. 1 (2024): 233-298.

Peta, Venkata Phanindra, Sai Krishna Reddy Khambam, and Venkata Praveen Kumar Kaluvakuri. "Designing Smart Virtual Assistants for Cloud Apps: Utilizing Advanced NLP and AI." Available at SSRN 4927242 (2023).

Muhammad, Shafi, Fatima Meerjat, Amna Meerjat, Aryendra Dalal, and Samad Abdul. "Enhancing Cybersecurity Measures for Blockchain: Securing Transactions in Decentralized Systems." Unique Endeavor in Business & Social Sciences 2, no. 1 (2023): 120-141.

Syed, Fayazoddin Mulla, and Faiza Kousar ES. "AI-Powered Security for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Devices." Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina 15, no. 1 (2024): 556-582.

S. Voulgaris, N. Fotiou, V. A. Siris, G. C. Polyzos, A. Tomaras and S. Karachontzitis, "Hierarchical Blockchain Topologies for Quality Control in Food Supply Chains," 2020 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2020, pp. 139-143, doi: 10.1109/EuCNC48522.2020.9200913.

Singh, V. (2025). Securing Transactional Integrity: Cybersecurity Practices in Fintech and Core Banking. QTanalytics Publication (Books), 86–96.

Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Lee, E. A., & Seshia, S. A. (2006). Introduction to embedded systems: A cyber-physical systems approach. Lexington, MA: The MIT Press.

Rajkumar, R., & Lee, E. A. (2010). Cyber-physical systems: The next revolution in computing and control. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 738-743).

Khaitan, S. K., & Mohan, S. (2021). Design patterns for industrial cyber-physical systems. Cambridge University Press.

Wolf, M., & Jasper, D. (2022). Industrial cyber-physical systems: Theory and applications. Springer International Publishing.

Gill, K. P., & Siddharth, A. (Eds.). (2023). Cyber-physical systems: Advances in design, modeling, analysis, and control. Academic Press.