Global Multidisciplinary Journal

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Dynamic Cloud Resource Optimization Using Reinforcement Learning And Queueing Models

4 Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

The rapid evolution of cloud computing infrastructures has generated unprecedented complexity in the management of computational resources, service quality, and task execution efficiency. As cloud ecosystems expand to accommodate heterogeneous workloads, Internet of Things platforms, big data analytics, containerized microservices, and emerging artificial intelligence services, the challenge of dynamically allocating resources in a manner that is both cost effective and performance optimized has become a central concern of both researchers and practitioners. Traditional rule based schedulers and static resource provisioning models have demonstrated limited adaptability to fluctuating demand, stochastic arrival patterns, and diverse service level objectives. Consequently, modern cloud management increasingly relies on advanced analytical frameworks that integrate learning based decision systems with classical operational research theories.

Among these, queueing theory has long served as a fundamental analytical tool for modeling congestion, waiting times, and service dynamics in distributed computing environments, providing a rigorous mathematical and conceptual basis for understanding workload behavior under uncertainty (Xiong and Perros, 2009; Knessl et al., 1986). At the same time, reinforcement learning, particularly deep Q learning, has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enabling systems to autonomously learn optimal decision policies from interaction with complex environments, even when explicit models are unavailable or intractable. The convergence of these two traditions has recently given rise to a new generation of intelligent scheduling frameworks that aim to combine the predictive and descriptive strengths of queueing models with the adaptive and prescriptive capabilities of deep reinforcement learning.

A pivotal contribution to this emerging field is the work of Kanikanti, Tiwari, Nayan, Suryawanshi, and Chauhan, who proposed a deep Q learning driven dynamic optimal task scheduling framework for cloud computing grounded in optimal queueing principles (Kanikanti et al., 2025). Their study represents a significant conceptual advancement by demonstrating how learning agents can leverage queueing theoretic insights to minimize waiting times, balance server loads, and enhance overall system throughput in real time. Rather than treating queueing theory and machine learning as competing paradigms, their approach illustrates how the two can be synergistically integrated into a unified control architecture.

This article builds upon and critically extends this foundational contribution by situating it within a broader theoretical, historical, and interdisciplinary context. Drawing exclusively on the provided body of literature, the present study develops a comprehensive analytical framework that examines how deep reinforcement learning and queueing theory can be jointly employed to address persistent challenges in cloud resource management. The analysis explores classical models of cloud infrastructure and performance evaluation (Armbrust et al., 2009; Nan et al., 2011), recent advances in queueing based optimization across domains such as cybersecurity, healthcare, smart grids, and microservices (Gupta and Sharma, 2023; Liang and Zhang, 2023; Gupta and Singh, 2023), and contemporary reinforcement learning driven scheduling strategies (Kanikanti et al., 2025). Through this synthesis, the article identifies theoretical gaps, methodological tensions, and underexplored opportunities for cross fertilization between analytical modeling and data driven control.

The methodological approach adopted in this study is qualitative and analytical rather than experimental. It systematically interprets and integrates insights from the referenced literature to construct a conceptual model of how intelligent scheduling systems operate within cloud environments characterized by stochastic arrivals, heterogeneous service demands, and complex interdependencies among computing resources. Particular attention is devoted to the ways in which queueing models provide structural constraints and performance metrics that guide reinforcement learning agents toward stable and efficient policies, thereby addressing longstanding criticisms regarding the opacity and unpredictability of black box learning systems.

The results of this analytical synthesis demonstrate that hybrid queueing reinforcement learning frameworks offer a more robust and theoretically grounded basis for dynamic resource allocation than either approach in isolation. By embedding queueing theoretic performance indicators such as waiting time, service rate, and system utilization into the reward structures and state representations of deep Q learning agents, it becomes possible to achieve adaptive scheduling strategies that are both empirically effective and analytically interpretable, as suggested by Kanikanti et al. (2025) and supported by a wide range of queueing based performance studies (Sowjanya et al., 2011; Mohanty et al., 2014; Brown Mary and Saravanan, 2013).

The discussion further explores the broader implications of this integrated paradigm for emerging cloud based applications, including edge computing, Internet of Things platforms, and data intensive analytics, while also critically examining limitations related to model assumptions, scalability, and the potential for instability in learning driven control systems (Sharma and Khan, 2023; Li and Wang, 2023; Kim and Park, 2023). Ultimately, the article argues that the future of intelligent cloud management lies in the continued fusion of learning based methods with rigorous analytical models, a trajectory that has been decisively shaped by the conceptual innovations introduced by Kanikanti et al. (2025).

Keywords

References

📄 IBM Smart Business Cloud Computing. Available at http://www.ibm.com/ibm/cloud/, 2010.
📄 Gupta, A. and Sharma, R. Cybersecurity Threat Mitigation Using Queueing Theory in Cloud Computing Environments. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 5, 234–247, 2023.
📄 Yang, F., Tan, Y. S., Dai, Y. S., and Guo, S. Performance evaluation of cloud service considering fault recovery. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing, Beijing, 571–576, 2009.
📄 Nan, X. M., He, Y. F., and Guan, L. Optimal Resource Allocation for Multimedia Cloud Based on Queueing Model. IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 1–6, 2011.
📄 Google App Engine. Available at http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/, 2010.
📄 Kanikanti, V. S. N., Tiwari, S. K., Nayan, V., Suryawanshi, S., and Chauhan, R. Deep Q Learning Driven Dynamic Optimal Task Scheduling for Cloud Computing Using Optimal Queuing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy, 217–222, 2025.
📄 Sowjanya, T. S., et al. The Queueing Theory in Cloud Computing to Reduce the Waiting Time. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering Technology, 1, 110–112, 2011.
📄 Smith, T. and Johnson, M. Queueing Model Based Resource Allocation in Healthcare Systems for Patient Flow Optimization. Healthcare Management Science, 26, 56–68, 2023.
📄 Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud. Private Cloud. Available at http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/private, 2010.
📄 Gupta, R. and Singh, A. Queueing Models for Optimizing Resource Allocation in Containerized Microservices Architectures. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, 12, 167–180, 2023.
📄 Knessl, C., Matkowsky, B., Schuss, Z., and Tier, C. Asymptotic behavior of a state dependent M G 1 queueing system. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 46, 483–505, 1986.
📄 Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud. Available at http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/, 2010.
📄 Li, H. and Wang, J. Queueing Model Based Analysis of IoT Networks for Reliability Optimization. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10, 789–802, 2023.
📄 Armbrust, M., Fox, A., et al. Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing. EECS Technical Report, 2009.
📄 Chen, X. and Zhang, Y. Performance Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle Systems Using Queueing Models for Traffic Optimization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 54, 234–247, 2023.
📄 Mohanty, S., Pattnaik, P. K., and Mund, G. B. A Comparative Approach to Reduce the Waiting Time Using Queueing Theory in Cloud Computing Environment. International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, 4, 469–474, 2014.
📄 Brown Mary, N. A. and Saravanan, K. Performance factors of Cloud Computing Data Centers using M G 1 queuing systems. International Journal of Grid Computing and Applications, 4, 2013.
📄 Patel, P. and Gupta, S. Performance Analysis of Quantum Computing Systems Using Queueing Models. Quantum Information Processing, 18, 345–358, 2023.
📄 Xiong, K. and Perros, H. Service performance and analysis in cloud computing. Proceedings of the World Congress on Services, Los Angeles, 693–700, 2009.
📄 Wang, Y. and Li, H. Performance Evaluation of Telecommunication Networks Using Queueing Models. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 71, 1409–1422, 2023.
📄 Kusaka, T., Okuda, T., Ideguchi, T., and Tian, X. Queueing theoretic approach to server allocation problem in time delay cloud computing systems. International Teletraffic Congress, 310–311, 2011.
📄 Liang, J. and Zhang, S. Queueing Model Based Optimization of Resource Allocation in IoT Enabled Smart Grids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19, 1002–1015, 2023.
📄 Kim, J. and Park, S. Performance Analysis of Big Data Analytics Systems Using Queueing Models with Server Breakdowns. Information Sciences, 456, 167–180, 2023.
📄 Sharma, A. and Khan, M. Queueing Model Based Analysis of Edge Computing Systems for Energy Efficient Resource Allocation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 9, 78–91, 2023.

How to Cite

Dr. Fabio Moretti. (2026). Dynamic Cloud Resource Optimization Using Reinforcement Learning And Queueing Models. Global Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(01), 120-129. https://www.grpublishing.org/journals/index.php/gmj/article/view/322

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.